I've got a couple of choices here. Do I bust on the obvious math problemashin (real word) or do I go for the "suspicious raised my eyebrow (the one not burned off in the methampetamine accident) and question an apparent lack of humanity that I have no real proof of." Maybe I have the energy for both. If I don't we're going with the unibrow.
Lately PokerStars has been pretty good about keeping the obvious bullshit away from the tables I play on. However, the 18 player Hold'em sitters tend to play out like I'm playing against a single person that can bounce around between positions, post a little meaningless chat trade chips to the low stacks and in general play to make me lose instead of playing to win. But to PS's credit I have finished in the money 3 consecutive gsmes.
When one sittest (real Amish word) down on a two table game you can expectorate (really a real word, but used improperly) that you might get moved. And you can expectorate (ditto) that since these take more than hour to resolve that you will have significant time spent vs. your adversaries.
For the duration of this sitter Max sat out and then sat back in bunchloadiful (real word) times. And the chip leader for the majority of the game is all shocked and surprised that he's back in the game. Mentions it for the first time after being at the same table with this guy for an hour.
Weird.
0 comments:
Post a Comment